Original Emails from/to Michael Stutz at WIRED - 04/25/98
followed by the online article URL

Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 13:37:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Stutz
To: jdecker@keelynet.com
Subject: Tesla news story

Hello --

I just left a message on your answering machine about this; I'm a reporter for Wired News and am writing about the International Tesla Society's convention that's happening this weekend (details at http://www.tesla.org/ ).

I was wondering if you were available for an interview (email or phone) about this and the technology that's being demonstrated; if you'd like to call collect, you can reach me at ***.***.****.

Thanks for your time.

Michael Stutz
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 20:49:41 -0500
From: Jerry W. Decker
To: Michael Stutz
Subject: Re: Tesla news story

Hi Michael!

I was not planning on making the Tesla conference this year, so I really can't say anything about what's there. But I'll bet you a case of beer there is no working overunity device that is testable by others or for sale as an operating unit, a kit or working plans to build it yourself.

Don't get me wrong, I think highly of J.W. McGinnis and the Tesla guys in general and have been a long time supporter of their activities, however, sometimes you need some flash to get people to attend your conference....... When inventors or experimenters make a claim and offer to explain or demonstrate it at your conference, if there is any possibility of something that might work, you jump on it, but I wouldn't ever count on it as fact.

Many of us suffer from the 'want to believe' syndrome and so are not as critical as we should be. By critical I mean requiring proof, we generally trust the people making the claims, which has resulted in us being labeled as half-baked, gullible, crackpots, cranks, etc..

From my 30 some odd years experience in this area, most of the claims I've seen revolve around;

IMHO, the only way any true overunity device will ever be absolutely proven is for it to run itself and power a load over a protracted period of time, 6 months, a year would be fine.

Because of the world changes that will NECESSARILY follow from practical proof of how to produce energy from the vacuum/aether/zpe/gravity and how to produce gravity control, the only way IMHO to release the information is FREELY so that all countries and peoples of the world may benefit.

This will best be done by FREELY providing the plans for the Proof of Principle (PoP) as detailed at http://keelynet.com/pop.htm and using the shareware document to ensure credit and some modest income is given to the inventor as detailed at http://keelynet.com/share.htm

Sure, keep the details for the big high power versions and sell those, but PROVE THE INITIAL EFFECT, in the form of the PoP. Instant credibility because anyone can build and test a desktop PROOF. If they choose to pursue it, either by working with the inventor or building on the initial PoP, it will result in all kinds of new discoveries and PRODUCTS which people can build, buy and USE.

Some of these free energy devices will require it to be kickstarted with an outside power source to get it running. Once it is running, the output power is folded back to the input so it becomes self-sustaining, then the extra energy is fed to a load.

IMHO, that load should ideally be resistive in the form of a heater or inductive as in a motor under mechanical load. The reason being that light intensity is subject to several variations ranging from an intermix of gas, unusual high efficiency filaments as with osmium opposed to tungsten, etc.. in the lamp which can confuse human perception. Yes, you can use LUX measurements to monitor for a consistent intensity, but my preference above all is a resistance heater.

With the load being a resistance heater, you can attach a thermocouple to it to show consistent heating along with how much current and voltage is being drawn by the heater.

The same technique applies to an inductive motor, except that you attach a mechanical load to the motor so that it provides a somewhat constant output torque (in horsepower) in addition to the current and voltage being used by the motor.

The error I continually see is measurements of power used by a load, with the output power compared to the input power to determine efficiency. The devices NEVER POWER THEMSELVES so are prone to all kinds of errors based on calculations of efficiency rather than the ultimate irrefutable proof of a self-sustaining device.

Self-sustaining operation is therefore my ultimate prerequisite as to the validity of a TRUE overunity, free energy device.

Where does the energy come from? Gravity and aether/zpe pervade EVERYTHING, therefore there is no such thing as a closed loop. It is a matter of TRANSLATING or transforming the gravity or aether/zpe inflows into mass, into a form we can use. That form can be either mechanical or electronic (magnetism, electrostatic or electromagnetism).

Well, that's my take on the entire field. To the best of my knowledge, there is NOT a working, self-sustaining overunity device that anyone can buy or build from a kit or plans.

People ask why we continue to devote time, money, effort and attention to the subject since nothing has resulted in the past 100 years or so.

In my opinion, our drive and devotion to the subject is due to some strange inner realization that we are in fact surrounded by unbelievable amounts of energy which are there for the tapping. Much like a puzzle you cannot walk away from, or if you do, you keep coming back to it.

All it takes is one breakthrough and the world will be all over this, many who are now RABID enemies of the entire field will then claim, they 'knew it all along'. We all expect such attitudes and put up with the majority who refuse to even consider the possibilities, let alone look into the various ways we all study to try to tap this incredible ambient energy.

The bottomline to our quest is the discovery and free release of the construction details to build a working overunity device which we fully expect to spread like wildfire and to be duplicated all over the world and to be put into practical use by all countries.

This single discovery will in turn spawn a science renaissance beyond anything we can now imagine. This renaissance will encompass not only physics and electronics but also MEDICINE and health because the aether/zpe inflows directly influence the function and health of living tissues.

If it would be of use to you or your readers, feel free to use this email or any part thereof as well as anything on the KeelyNet website.

KeelyNet is not here for entertainment, nor to attract attention. It started as a semi-private BBS with word of mouth recommendations only between serious researchers and experimenters. The inevitable migration to the Internet exposed us to all kinds of additional limelight which was not sought or solicited. We have a purpose, we have goals, we shall achieve those goals.

Michael, thanks for your interest, if there is anything I can do to help you in future, drop me a line. You'll know when we succeed!
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 16:03:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Stutz
To: Jerry W. Decker
Subject: Re: Tesla news story Jerry-- Thanks for all the good comments. The story just went up at;

http://www.wired.com/news/news/technology/story/11898.html .

regards - m
From: Tebearden
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 23:44:53 EDT
To: Jerry Decker
Subject: Re: Response to Wired Magazine request

Agree with most of your comments except a couple of fidgets.