I may have a problem with NTSC, yes. Surely someone in the US would be
interested in such an experiment. Absolutely nothing to loose in trying it
You say "the evidence is that it has already been proven (free energy)".
What evidence do you refer, I'm familiar with lots of claims and I can't
think what it is you're refering to. Sure there are lots of videos and
statements from people who honestly believe they have free energy in one
form or another. Would you call this evidence valid?
I've been privy to and conducted many examinations of various claims. All
have eventually been found in error for one reason or another. Most of the
claimants are honest and truthful (though there have been exceptions) and
have made genuine mistakes. Problem is we hear about the claim but we
rarely hear about the outcome of an examination if it is negative (nobody
wants to hear a negative result?). Some claims, by their very nature,
remain unchallanged. Therefore it seems unwise to use the number of claims
to add weight to an arguement for the affirmative.
It's not that I don't want to believe. It would probably be more correct to
state the opposite, otherwise we would'nt be having this conversation,
don't you think? What is the evidence that drives your belief that free
energy has already been proven beyond doubt? We can believe what we like,
that is thankfully our own business. However, a claim is a statement of
belief based on, hopefully, physical evidence. If the physical evidence
does not exist or is in error then the claim and belief are based on error.
Is it a general feeling that you have or is there one particular example
that can define your position? Can anyone provide an example of a valid
free energy claim? All the hope in the world here John, throw me a bone.
At 20:45 1/04/99 +1200, you wrote:
>I have not been witness to a great number of things that I believe, Most
>in our world we take as fact without actually seeing them in real life, I
>seen video's and there are plenty of totally trust worthy claims, So if
>not want to believe that's fine but the evidence is that it has already been
>proven, I meant to send it to the whole list not just you, It is the stance
>that I dislike it was not directed at you.
>My aim is not just to know free energy is real which I already do but to make
>and understand it.
>If your video camera can record NTSC then fine but the problem is getting it
>turned into NTSC from PAL, To work we want this to be as direct as possible.